http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-01
14:11:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 1 14:11:46 2013
New Revision: 195658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195658
Log:
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
17:55:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:55:34 2013
New Revision: 195343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195343
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
18:01:59 UTC ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20 18:09:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Untested fix. As the testcase shows, also a widening conversion can be a
problem, if it extends from signed integral type to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20
18:35:20 UTC ---
Yeah, I'm afraid assuming you never do 1 31 is going to break simply way too
much code in the wild.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20 20:17:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Yeah, I'm afraid assuming you never do 1 31 is going to break simply way
too
much code in the wild.
I noticed that clang
10 matches
Mail list logo