[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2021-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2017-12-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-03-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-18 10:33:27 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 18 10:33:11 2013 New Revision: 196777 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196777 Log: 2013-03-18

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05 10:04:53 UTC --- I have a fix for the points-to analysis, but the IPA reference bug is hard to fix as puts may recurse back into the current unit and it may

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug tree-optimization/56210] invalid -Warray-bounds warning

2013-02-05 Thread jim at meyering dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56210 --- Comment #5 from jim at meyering dot net 2013-02-05 17:00:47 UTC --- Hi Jakub, Exactly. The lack of const there was a bug, and I fixed that before reporting the gcc behavior that had surprised me.