http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-04-10
15:05:44 UTC ---
Like with the simple
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 196872)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2013-04-10
14:58:00 UTC ---
Hmm, it seems to be a rather unfortunate choice of aligning x vs. v1 which
seems to only depend on the order in which the data-refs appear in the
data-ref array. That is, vect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56878
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2013-04-08
15:47:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 29826
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29826
testcase
Need to be compiled on x86 with the following options:
-O3 -funroll-loops -ffas
