[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 Bug 59487 depends on bug 58721, which changed state. Bug 58721 Summary: [4.9 Regression] The subroutine perdida is no longer inlined in fatigue.f90 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58721 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #7 from GGanesh Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com --- Richard! With gcc version 4.9.0 20140224, I could see a gap between with/without -fwhole-program. with -fwhole-program : time ./rnflowWhPr real0m26.184s user

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #7 from GGanesh

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #9 from GGanesh Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at amd dot com --- Other options are -Ofast -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||58721 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- r202826 was fixed later by the fix for PR58656 (rnflow regression), so your bisection converged on a bogus revision. OK! I was too focused on the -fwhole-program option.

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- dominiq at lps dot ens.fr gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot

[Bug tree-optimization/59487] [4.9 Regression] When compiled with -fwhole-program rnflow.f90 runs up to 40% slower after r202826

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59487 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Still the regression must appear with a different revision. The one you cited has nothing to do with -fwhole-program. I see the slowdown with -fwhole-program for all the