http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
I have to use something like:
int a, b[1];
int
main ()
{
lbl:
for (; a; a--)
if (b[1000])
goto lbl;
return 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #4 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
I have to use something like:
int a, b[1];
int
main ()
{
lbl:
for (; a; a--)
if (b[1000])
goto lbl;
return 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
I have to use something like:
int a, b[1];
int
main ()
{
lbl:
for (; a; a--)
if (b[1000])
goto lbl;
return 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
So, it's also a 4.8 regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #7 from Zhendong Su su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---
Should I report the out-out-bound array access warning issue as a separate
report? Thanks.
Reported it as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60121
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
LIM is pulling the out of bounds load out of the loop.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fmartinez at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60115
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 60121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
10 matches
Mail list logo
