https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.3 |4.8.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Bien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
-fno-ivopts fixes it. Reverting r195609 on top of the branch doesn't fix it,
backporting r196782 does.
IVOPTs ends up choosing different IVs, but I don't see anything obviously
wrong ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
So - would be interesting to know what fixed it on trunk.