https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
*** Bug 62075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
We have
patt_24 = DOT_PROD_EXPR <_12, _12, prephitmp_48>;
and
_12 = _11 >> 2;
is not STMT_VINFO_IN_PATTERN_P but it doesn't have a vec_stmt yet even
though it is there:
vect__12.29_90 = vect__11.27_87
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
