[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2015-06-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 11:03:26 2015 New Revision: 224072 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224072root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2015-06-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015 New Revision: 224059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2015-06-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 3 13:50:11 2015 New Revision: 224081 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224081root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-03 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2015-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 27 14:20:48 2015 New Revision: 223759 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223759root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-05-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014 New Revision: 218079 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-11-26 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-20 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #14 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- I confirm what I observed is a testsuite harness problem, for which I proposed a patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01792.html dejagnu-1.5 (as shipped with Ubuntu 14.04)

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-16 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #9 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Forgot to

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10) On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-16 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #12 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry, I thought you had the setup needed to reproduce the tests. I am using qemu. All execution tests fail (not only -O0), for instance with GCC configured as: --target=arm-none-eabi

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-16 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #13 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- To be more specific, I'm using qemu 2.0.0. But I've switched to a new x86_64 host running Ubuntu-14.04, and the tests pass. I observed the failures when using a x86_64 host running Red-Hat 5.

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-15 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 clyon at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-10-15 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #9 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Forgot to mention that my observation is true on trunk and 4.9 branch. I didn't notice it earlier because I run validations for every commit on the 4.9 branch, and not as often on trunk.