[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-04-30 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 30 18:01:07 2015 New Revision: 222650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222650root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63551 *

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-04-30 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 30 18:03:53 2015 New Revision: 222651 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222651root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63551 *

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-04-30 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 30 18:05:34 2015 New Revision: 222652 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222652root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63551 *

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2015-04-30 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 30 18:41:33 2015 New Revision: 222653 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222653root=gccview=rev Log: * g++.dg/ipa/pr63551.C: New test.

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-15 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) The gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c test fails on the 4.9 branch on 32-bit targets (i386, arm, s390): gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c:24:9: warning: this

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 15 10:44:53 2014 New Revision: 218740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218740root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/63551 *

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- The gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c test fails on the 4.9 branch on 32-bit targets (i386, arm, s390): gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c:24:9: warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90 Seems

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-03 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 Bug 63551 depends on bug 64153, which changed state. Bug 64153 Summary: [5.0 regression] r218205 miscompiles libgomp https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64153 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-01 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Dec 1 12:05:41 2014 New Revision: 218205 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218205root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-01 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-01 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Dec 1 12:52:58 2014 New Revision: 218208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218208root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-01 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-12-01 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-11-25 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 64041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-11-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) indeed, somewhere we need to view convert the aggregate value... Predicates works on conditions on arguments, so I suppose this ought to

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-11-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have posted the fix to the mailing list as well: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02842.html

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-11-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at

[Bug tree-optimization/63551] [4.9/5 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-10-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- indeed, somewhere we need to view convert the aggregate value... Predicates works on conditions on arguments, so I suppose this ought to happen at ipa-prop side. Martin?