https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34229
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34229action=edit
patch
Ok, I see the regression introduced by that rev., but on trunk (r218479)
I get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Cederman cederman at gaisler dot com ---
Probably the regression was mitigated by the partial fix for PR63677:
Yes, that seems to be the case for my attached example. Do you think that the
regression is mitigated in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, cederman at gaisler dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Cederman cederman at gaisler dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
AFAICT if there is any speedup with the patch in comment 5, it is negligible on
a 2.8Ghz Corei7 and x86_64-apple-darwin14: ~7.1s with/without the patch. Note
that the timing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
