https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
Bug 66974 depends on bug 83202, which changed state.
Bug 83202 Summary: Try joining operations on consecutive array elements during
tree vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83202
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 14 15:18:16 2017
New Revision: 255642
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255642&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66974
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
--- Comment #5 from Ganesh Ajjanagadde ---
That I do not consider a readable or scalable solution.
Furthermore, this is a bug, and the FFmpeg codebase gets compiled across a wide
array of compilers. We can't insert hacks for specific GCC versions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
--- Comment #2 from Ganesh Ajjanagadde ---
Of course. However, the caller might ensure that order is always in the valid
range (e.g <= 3 in this case), and the callee should not have to verify this
if that is the case. The reason we do not actual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
DJ Delorie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from DJ
