[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- [Sorry for the delay, email hiccup over the last couple of days] > CCing Eric on whether REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER should be checked in > operand_equal_p and whether TYPE_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER doesn't have

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > [Sorry for the delay, email hiccup over the last couple of days] > > > CCing Eric on whether REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER should be checked in > >

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- > How do you ensure that? You could (perhaps through aliasing violation or > union or what) access the same memory slot through two different MEMs, and > if one of them has reverse and the other does

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > There are various bugs in the r232508 change. > The > gcc_assert (sz0 == sz1); > gcc_assert (max0 == max1); > gcc_assert (rev0 == rev1); > asserts are

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- There are various bugs in the r232508 change. The gcc_assert (sz0 == sz1); gcc_assert (max0 == max1); gcc_assert (rev0 == rev1); asserts are clearly bogus, while for compatible type I bet size will be

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #9 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > There are various bugs in the r232508 change. > The > gcc_assert (sz0 == sz1); > gcc_assert (max0 == max1); > gcc_assert (rev0 == rev1); >

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69352] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure with --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto

2016-01-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69352 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 19 13:19:01 2016 New Revision: 232557 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232557=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-19 Richard Biener PR