https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 21 08:50:38 2016
New Revision: 232666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-01-21 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/69378
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
This patch works for me on this testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 37406
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37406&action=edit
patch for testing
Patch I am testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, difference is in PRE:
--- a/pr61034.C.123t.pre2016-01-20 10:27:14.052404275 +0100
+++ b/pr61034.C.123t.pre2016-01-20 10:26:24.331842158 +0100
@@ -778,289 +778,344 @@
Value numbering sto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Sadly no, it didn't.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69378
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
