[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 25 09:07:08 2016 New Revision: 233693 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233693=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-25 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Seems to be fixed, thanks! I've tried several variations, ok too.

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Now hopefully fixed on trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Feb 16 15:00:45 2016 New Revision: 233453 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233453=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-16 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Looks like the fix was too constrained. I have a patch to fix it some more.

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Cherepanov --- --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- > Actually the middle-end memory model makes this valid and FREs redundant store > elimination breaks it. And function boundaries are not an obstacle for

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6