[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-10-06 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-10-06 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Oct 6 16:23:22 2016 New Revision: 240836 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240836=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71661 * tree-cfgcleanup.c

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-10-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5) > We can likely invalidate the cached information, but ISTM that there's a > reasonable chance we're going to be playing whack-a-mole with this stuff.

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-10-04 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- As noted in my last comment, removal of a forwarder block may turn an irreducible loop into a natural loop. The loop header for any such exposed natural loop will not be recognized as a loop header by

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-10-04 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So digging a bit deeper. When we leave threading we've exposed a new natural loop. However, there is still an irreducible loop in the CFG. The CFG and the cached loop information are conservatively

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-10-04 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-07-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- This to me looks like some transformation of a loop that doesn't properly adjust the number of iterations. During vrp1 loop2 is: loop_2 (header = 11, latch = 13, niter = c_23 + 1 <= 3 ? 2 - c_23 : 0,

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-06-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/71661] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3

2016-06-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71661 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code