https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 30 17:35:40 2016
New Revision: 243038
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-30 Vladimir Makarov
PR tree-optimization/77856
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So, %ebx doesn't hold 1 as it is supposed to, but 1 << %ecx (64).
> Vlad, could you please have a look?
It is a bug in a new optimization (invariant inherita
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
