[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-12 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-12 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #19 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jan 12 17:02:38 2017 New Revision: 244372 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244372=gcc=rev Log: Add Cortex-A15 tuning to gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #17) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > > Unless people commonly use > > RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-mtune=cortex-a15,-mtune=cortex-m7\}'

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-11 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #17 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > Unless people commonly use > RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-mtune=cortex-a15,-mtune=cortex-m7\}' or > something similar, that might work well. The

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-11 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Preud'homme --- FYI: -mtune=cortex-a15 works for an arm-none-eabi toolchain targetting Cortex-M7

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #14) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > > So do you want something like: > > /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicts with multilib options" { arm*-*-* } { > >

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-11 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2017-01-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-12-12 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-25 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #11 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to amker from comment #10) > Hi Prathamesh, > I saw it starting XPASS on arm-none-eabi in test now: > > spawn /.../gcc/xgcc -B/.../gcc/ >

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-25 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-17 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #9 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Thu Nov 17 09:48:34 2016 New Revision: 242540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242540=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-17 Prathamesh Kulkarni

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-16 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #6) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > > It's a matter of costs (here BRANCH_COST

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-16 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > It's a matter of costs (here BRANCH_COST and its uses in fold and ifcombine). > > You don't mention what IL differences your patch causes

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- It's a matter of costs (here BRANCH_COST and its uses in fold and ifcombine). You don't mention what IL differences your patch causes (I'll check soon myself). For the issue at hand I suggest to XFAIL for

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-15 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #4 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi, I think this seems to be an issue with uninit pass. The same behavior can be observed for following test-case on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu regardless of r241915. (test-case is a slight

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-14 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #2) > Hi Thomas, > I am trying to cross-build for cortex-m4 to reproduce the issue locally. > Could you please share the configure opts you used ? > > Thanks, >

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-14 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Thomas, I am trying to cross-build for cortex-m4 to reproduce the issue locally. Could you please share the configure opts you used ? Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug tree-optimization/78319] [7 Regression] PASS->FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 20)

2016-11-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|PASS->FAIL: