https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Reducing the test-case bit more:
$ int a = 0, c = 0;
static int d[][8] = {};
int main ()
{
int e;
for (int b = 0; b < 4; b++)
{
__builtin_printf ("%d\n", b, e);
while (a && c++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code