https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tvrtko.ursulin at linux dot
intel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.1.1
Target Milestone|6.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed May 31 08:45:23 2017
New Revision: 248724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248724=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR 80293] Dont totally-scalarize char arrays
2017-05-31 Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> That said, the array cases we've seen are somewhat disturbing...
Cases? Can you point me to the other ones, please? What type do they
have?
> maybe we can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > We have another bugreport that complains about SRA and Martin said he had
> > patches but intended to wait for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> We have another bugreport that complains about SRA and Martin said he had
> patches but intended to wait for GCC 8.
My patch for PR 78687 unfortunately won't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
10 matches
Mail list logo
