https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 12 13:47:26 2017
New Revision: 246875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246875=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-04-12 Richard Biener
Jeff Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
That's exactly what I tested yesterday. It bootstraps and regression tests
successfully. So no need to wait on the testrun.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|law at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> Given how late in stage4 we are, I think rejecting TMR without trying to
> rewrite them into a regular MEM_REF is probably the best thing to do.
Agreed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Given how late in stage4 we are, I think rejecting TMR without trying to
rewrite them into a regular MEM_REF is probably the best thing to do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED