https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Prospective patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00137.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
The commentary for r248678 reads in part: "Compute costs for doing no peeling
at all, compare to the best peeling costs so far and avoid peeling if cheaper."
Indeed, if you look at the vect dump for r248677,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org|wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*, i?86-*-*, |powerpc*-*-*, i?86-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-*, i?86-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
10 matches
Mail list logo
