[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

2018-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 11 13:42:29 2018 New Revision: 256535 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256535=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

2018-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

2018-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- I have a patch robustifying VRP. Yes, we don't want to leak overflow constants into the IL but we're not there yet and I'd rather have this done in a robust way but couldn't yet thing of one (like not

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

2018-01-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

2017-12-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83435] [8 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:211

2017-12-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83435 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1