https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
>
> Martin Sebor changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I posted a patch for a similar issue reported in bug 83776
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02144.html). It handles
MEM_REFs and diagnoses the test case in comment #0 (I must have missed that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 43259
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43259=edit
proposed UNTESTED patch
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> I don't think we want to be adding new cases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84047
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] missing |[6/7/8 Regression] missing
11 matches
Mail list logo