https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 28, 2018 6:44:43 PM GMT+01:00, "jnordholz at sect dot tu-berlin.de"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
>
>--- Comment #7 from Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
--- Comment #7 from Jan Nordholz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Btw, the behavior is the way you describe since forever. That GCC looks at
> the constant initializer for the array is just a direct consequence of it
> looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> It's not just -faggressive-loop-optimizations, it seems that constructors of
> weak globals are available for folding, and I really doubt that's actually
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, jnordholz at sect dot tu-berlin.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
>
> Jan Nordholz changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Jan Nordholz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|