[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2022-02-23 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target|nvptx |gcn --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2020-10-15 Thread ams at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Stubbs --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5) > I've removed the xfail for nvptx. > > The only remaining xfail is for gcn. Is that one still necessary? The test still fails for gcn.

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2020-10-15 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2020-10-15 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > [ FWIW, adding an extra fre pass here also results in optimal gimple: > ... > diff --git a/gcc/passes.def b/gcc/passes.def > index 3ebcfc30349..6b64f600c4a 100644

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2018-11-20 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Tom: Can the bug be marked as resolved? https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HowToPrepareATestcase: ... Each testcase which is XFAIL-ed must have a corresponding PR open in

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2018-11-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2018-05-09 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/84958] int loads not eliminated against larger stores

2018-03-19 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84958 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-03/msg00566.html : Author: vries Date: Mon Mar 19 19:12:53 2018 New Revision: 258656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258656=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Add nvptx xfail