[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-08-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-05-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu May 10 07:38:24 2018 New Revision: 260107 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260107=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/85699 * gcc.dg/nextafter-1.c (NO_LONG_DOUBLE):

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-05-09 Thread andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov --- Jakub, here is the requested output: bug at 136 aa == -3.36210314311209350626267781732175260e-4932L / 4.0L + 3.64519953188247460252840593361941982e-4951L bug at 145 aa ==

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-05-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 44097 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44097=edit gcc9-pr85699.patch Untested workaround (if we want to workaround libc bugs in the testsuite).

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-05-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- If you are using glibc < 2.24, then maybe this is: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20205

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-05-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |9.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85699] [9 regression] gcc.dg/nextafter-2.c fail

2018-05-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 regression] |[9 regression]