[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2019-04-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2019-03-10 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Sun Mar 10 16:20:06 2019 New Revision: 269556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269556&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make SRA less strict with memcpy performing MEM_REFs 2019-03-10 Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2019-02-22 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > struct A { double a, b; }; > struct B : A {}; > templatevoid cp(T&a,T const&b){a=b;} > double f(B x){ > B y; cp(y,x); > B z; cp(z,x); > return y.a - z.a; > }

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2019-02-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2018-12-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2018-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > struct A { double a, b; }; > struct B : A {}; > templatevoid cp(T&a,T const&b){a=b;} > double f(B x){ > B y; cp(y,x); > B z; cp(z,x); > return y.a - z.a; > }

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2018-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2018-08-21 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Or just: struct A { double a, b; }; struct B : A {}; double f(B x){ B y; A*px=&x; A*py=&y; *py=*px; return y.a; } MEM[(struct A *)&y] = MEM[(const struct A &)&x]; y_6 = MEM[(struct A *)&y]; y

[Bug tree-optimization/87008] [8/9 Regression] gimple mem-to-mem assignment badly optimized

2018-08-21 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87008 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- struct A { double a, b; }; struct B : A {}; templatevoid cp(T&a,T const&b){a=b;} double f(B x){ B y; cp(y,x); B z; cp(z,x); return y.a - z.a; } This is not quite equivalent because RTL manages to optimiz