https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 7 08:22:01 2019
New Revision: 268609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268609=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-02-07 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2018-11-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This seems a reasonable enough example for punning to me, given that all
accesses are via the union type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
>
> --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> On Wed,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88223
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Hmm, OTOH the C standard specifies that the store to u.b.b makes it the
> u.b the active member and it makes the old contents
