https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3f293348768667c07770e433ff00af51fee73a2
commit r11-5186-gd3f293348768667c07770e433ff00af51fee73a2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49595|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 49597
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49597=edit
op2_range implementation
I think this does what you want for op2_range.
I tried it with:
void f1 (int i, int j)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49595
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49595=edit
gcc11-pr91029-2.patch
Untested patch implementing the op1 rules. Dunno what to do for op2, one needs
to create a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #8 from Bruno Haible ---
> what is the reason to require that b >= 0 in all of this?
In the 1990ies there were portability problems with a%b, b < 0. ANSI C said
that the result was machine-dependent if a < 0 or b < 0. Fortunately
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71c9d2b088c9d409a1bd3b50523ac4623a5bf1b4
commit r11-5150-g71c9d2b088c9d409a1bd3b50523ac4623a5bf1b4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible ---
Nice! Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e27e7a582a9b86bcf86f5c103cd947672746e97
commit r11-5111-g1e27e7a582a9b86bcf86f5c103cd947672746e97
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91029
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Host|
13 matches
Mail list logo
