[Bug tree-optimization/93404] [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression

2020-02-02 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/93404] [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression

2020-01-27 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/93404] [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression

2020-01-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/93404] [10 regression] -O2 and -O2 -flto SPEC2006 and 2017 code size regression

2020-01-23 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93404 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 47701 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47701=edit inliner size stats parser It took me a while to find some reasonable way to analyze code size regressions caused by