https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
>
> --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
> That's why I asked "What language relies on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> But regardless of what language might have even looser rules than C/C++ in
> this area, it would seem like a rather unfortunate design limitation for GCC
> not to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
That's why I asked "What language relies on this?"
But regardless of what language might have even looser rules than C/C++ in this
area, it would seem like a rather unfortunate design limitation for GCC not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Redundant store not |[8/9/10 Regression]
