https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Kr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:466ad887c9e1cd5a6762e7ec620eef2c8175b50d
commit r9-8614-g466ad887c9e1cd5a6762e7ec620eef2c8175b50d
Author: Bin Cheng
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 18 May 2020, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
>
> --- Comment #10 from bin cheng ---
> Hi，should I backport this and PR95110 to branc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #10 from bin cheng ---
Hi，should I backport this and PR95110 to branches? Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18
commit r11-345-gf6e1a4cd83190746b6544917f7526fa480ca5f18
Author: Bin Cheng
Date: Wed May 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #8 from bin cheng ---
Root cause is in build_classic_dist_vector -> constant_access_functions which
adds unit distance vector only in case of constant access function. It should
cover invariant cases. Testing a patch. Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #7 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> So I think the issue is not dependence testing but loop distribution
> accepting a
> zero dependence distance as OK. Of course dependence analysis is quite
> useles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Before Richards change we likely gave up on the mismatch in access function
dimensionality for f[b] vs. f[b].e but now we compute a dependence distance
of zero.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So I think the issue is not dependence testing but loop distribution accepting
a
zero dependence distance as OK. Of course dependence analysis is quite useless
here since the accesses are to the same locati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10/11 Regression]
11 matches
Mail list logo
