[Bug tree-optimization/95097] Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges

2021-08-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95097] Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges

2021-08-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/95097] Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges

2020-05-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Just to quote EVRP sees : _1 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(f); _2 = _1 & 1048575; if (_2 != 0) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : _3 = f.x; _4 = (unsigned int) _3; y_8 = _4 * 4096; if

[Bug tree-optimization/95097] Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges

2020-05-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|85316 | Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95097] Missed optimization with bitfield value ranges

2020-05-12 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95097 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-13 Ever confirmed|0