[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

2020-12-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e603837f7ad886df62e02ac0cd395ec17b7d587 commit r11-6376-g9e603837f7ad886df62e02ac0cd395ec17b7d587 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

2020-12-30 Thread jeffhurchalla at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Hurchalla --- Thanks for your fix. I built/installed gcc from the latest git sources, and prior to applying your patch, as expected the test cases in this report produced incorrect results. After I applied your patch,

[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

2020-12-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 49858 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49858=edit gcc11-pr98474.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

2020-12-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/98474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] incorrect results using __uint128_t

2020-12-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98474 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|incorrect results using |[8/9/10/11 Regression]