[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-02-01 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-02-01 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #12 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Should be fixed in gcc-11. (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9) > It is also relatively easy to track the EAF flags here, I will try to get > quick stats on how often this makes difference (and

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-02-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11056ab7687f7156846e93557c9171b77713bd7e commit r11-7022-g11056ab7687f7156846e93557c9171b77713bd7e Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-01-30 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9) > Thanks for all the detailed analysis and sorry for getting into this late. > > > Oh, thank you! Only after many printf() attempts it sunk in that > >

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-01-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-01-10 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > > Possibly in discovering pure/constness. See uses

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-01-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > Possibly in discovering pure/constness. See uses of > > gimple_call_return_slot_opt_p in

[Bug tree-optimization/98499] [11 Regression] Possibly bad std::string initialization in constructors

2021-01-06 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499 --- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Possibly in discovering pure/constness. See uses of > gimple_call_return_slot_opt_p in tree-ssa-structalias.c Aha, that's useful! Trying to understand