[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51b23ba76f00610360a023de4cdae1641ca3b961 commit r10-9287-g51b23ba76f00610360a023de4cdae1641ca3b961 Author: Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk, but it's latent on release branches and should be fixed there too.

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea74a3f548eb321429c371e327e778e63d9128a0 commit r11-6814-gea74a3f548eb321429c371e327e778e63d9128a0 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > that is, we end up with > >[local count: 73320728]: > _99 = {j$b_2(D)}; > _100 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(_99); > _101 = [vec_duplicate_expr]

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 5 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5=edit patch Can somebody test this? As said I believe there's a wrong-code piece left (but the testcase in this PR is too

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- So the issue is that hi_start isn't halved I think or hi_start isn't added when i&1 != 0. So probably all non-single round duplicate are broken right now. @@ -5091,13 +5091,14 @@ duplicate_and_interleave

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.0 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- This backtrace started with my commit 64432b680eab0bddbe9a4ad4798457cf6a14ad60 but before this it still ICEd with: foo.c: In function 'i': foo.c:12:1: error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr'

[Bug tree-optimization/98535] [11 Regression] ICE in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands(tree_node**, int) building 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3