https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.3|10.4
--- Comment #10 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > I'm afraid no.
> > The vectorization can handle addresses into the simd arrays, but right now
> > only if it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> I'm afraid no.
> The vectorization can handle addresses into the simd arrays, but right now
> only if it accesses the whole element, i.e. when we can turn the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm afraid no.
The vectorization can handle addresses into the simd arrays, but right now only
if it accesses the whole element, i.e. when we can turn the simd array into a
vector register (or set thereof)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> That change included an important bugfix for the simd handling of
> addressable locals, when they escape they would be then mishandled during
> vectorization.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
