https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #11)
> It should be labeled [12 Regression] again, then, as the issue is still
> there on trunk.
w/ -O2 -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse (possibly with -fno-tree-dse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on master with r12-248-gb58dc0b803057c0e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
--- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha ---
gcc-12.0.0-alpha20210530 snapshot (g:a0a7adeea31918deefb053a9a15257af94aecfaf)
compiles the testcase w/o ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek