[Bug tree-optimization/99880] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_set_vectorized_backedge_value, at tree-vect-loop.c:9161 since r10-3711-g69f8c1aef5cdcc54

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5c170e080399fb3d24a38bbfcd66bd4675abe53 commit r11-8005-ge5c170e080399fb3d24a38bbfcd66bd4675abe53 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/99880] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_set_vectorized_backedge_value, at tree-vect-loop.c:9161 since r10-3711-g69f8c1aef5cdcc54

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So we're having a PHI latch value vectorized because it's used by the outer loop (vect_used_in_outer_by_reduction), but the vect_nested_cycle def PHI in the inner loop isn't relevant since it's

[Bug tree-optimization/99880] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_set_vectorized_backedge_value, at tree-vect-loop.c:9161 since r10-3711-g69f8c1aef5cdcc54

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/99880] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_set_vectorized_backedge_value, at tree-vect-loop.c:9161 since r10-3711-g69f8c1aef5cdcc54

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.3.0 Last reconfirmed|