[Bug web/109355] Add a text warning to old gcc online manual stating it is out of date

2023-03-31 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109355 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug web/109355] Add a text warning to old gcc online manual stating it is out of date

2023-03-31 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109355 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- As I mentioned in previous discussions of this idea: any implementation should *not* involve simply editing the old generated files in place; it needs to involve keeping an unmodified

[Bug web/109355] Add a text warning to old gcc online manual stating it is out of date

2023-03-31 Thread jg at jguk dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109355 --- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Oh and the manual is not exactly out of date for that version of gcc. So the > text you have would be wrong. Sorry, you're completely right. A script could

[Bug web/109355] Add a text warning to old gcc online manual stating it is out of date

2023-03-31 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109355 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- We could add server rules to insert a banner into the HTML on every page, but it's not trivial. You might be thinking of PR 65699.

[Bug web/109355] Add a text warning to old gcc online manual stating it is out of date

2023-03-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109355 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Oh and the manual is not exactly out of date for that version of gcc. So the text you have would be wrong.

[Bug web/109355] Add a text warning to old gcc online manual stating it is out of date

2023-03-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109355 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There is another bug about adding a version to the manual pages. Thar would be better. Touching old generated html files is not a good solution. Plus the version is in the url.