http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-12-08 19:34:48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
11:14:43 UTC ---
In fact, the nicest solution would be to investigate how much of Ian's document
is already duplicated in the GNU binutils sources:
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-09 09:00 ---
Something as simple as this would already fix the broken link.
Index: gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
===
--- gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi(revision 142582)
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-12-09 13:40
---
Subject: Re: dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ??? This manual is apparently not available online. Keep
the cross
But
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-12-08 19:34 ---
|
\ ' /
-- (*) --
*
0@
@*
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:29 ---
As I explained in 2003, this is a web problem, not a source code bug, and so
not a regression. It is a new feature of the manual such that each user of the
manual may need to do something to take advantage of the new
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 20:40 ---
Well, I can't even find this paragraph you want to reference.
And I was under the impression that there was a kind-of you broke it, you fix
it rule with GCC bugs. Am I wrong or does this just not apply to you?
--
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-12-08 21:00 ---
Subject: Re: dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Well, I can't even find this paragraph you want to reference.
The reference is to a whole
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-06-12 07:18 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
still failing ... since it has been opened about 2.5y ago, should it be closed
as wontfix ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821
10 matches
Mail list logo
