https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #12 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Based on a recursive grep of the wwwdocs repo the only remaining use of "xhtml"
is a variable "XHTML" in htdocs/style.mhtml which, AFAICS, doesn't any longer
actually have anything to do with XHTML.
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #10)
> (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #0)
> > So apart from the headers, little work ought to be needed for the
> > conversion itself.
>
> Well, no.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #10 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Mostly done,
cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-09/msg5.html
And for the actual conversion,
cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00026.html
The sole page not labeled as HTML 5 now is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #9 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> A replacement for MetaHTML is already available, we just need to switch to
> using it.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00176.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> A replacement for MetaHTML is already available, we just need to switch to
> using it.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00176.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
A replacement for MetaHTML is already available, we just need to switch to
using it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00176.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist ---
I looked through some mails in the archives, and I learned that the current
wwwdocs uses metahtml, which hasn't been maintained for years and years, and
doesn't even compile anymore. Ugh!
For an even more
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Sure, I can chip in a little, though I'm no html expert. Do you have some
branch somewhere where you're working, or?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
The validation script that runs upon committing a change and sends email likely
needs to change too. There is https://validator.github.io/validator/ that can
be run as a batch script (needs java), or one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87050
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
13 matches
Mail list logo
