Ok, I see.
2023年4月18日(火) 17:27 Jonathan Wakely :
> The gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org list is for automated email from our Bugzilla
> database, please don't use it to report bugs or to ask questions about
> how GCC works.
>
> For questions about using GCC send email to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org and
> to report
The gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org list is for automated email from our Bugzilla
database, please don't use it to report bugs or to ask questions about
how GCC works.
For questions about using GCC send email to gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org and
to report bugs please use bugzilla: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
Thanks!
Ok, thanks!
2023年4月18日(火) 16:06 Andreas Schwab :
> On Apr 18 2023, naoki ueda via Gcc-bugs wrote:
>
> > The attached code says "int a = 100;", but it should normally be
> > initialized with an "undefined value", but in the case of gcc-10, it is
> > initialized with "0". Isn't this a bug in
On Apr 18 2023, naoki ueda via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> The attached code says "int a = 100;", but it should normally be
> initialized with an "undefined value", but in the case of gcc-10, it is
> initialized with "0". Isn't this a bug in gcc-10?
0 is just one instance of "undefined value".
--
The attached code says "int a = 100;", but it should normally be
initialized with an "undefined value", but in the case of gcc-10, it is
initialized with "0". Isn't this a bug in gcc-10?
#include
int main(void)
{
int n;
for (n = 1;n <= 5;n++) {
switch (n)
{ int a =
