|internal compiler error: in |compiler error: in
|fld_incomplete_type_of with |fld_incomplete_type_of with
|may_alias |may_alias
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed for 12.4+ and 13.4+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114572
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed for 12.4+ too.
]
|[[attr]] causes |[[attr]] causes
|internal compiler error: in |internal compiler error: in
|decl_attributes, at |decl_attributes, at
|attribs.cc:776 |attribs.cc:776
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4126b329b2ae4f2b60efa1c7ad51b576de168bd
commit r12-10534-gd4126b329b2ae4f2b60efa1c7ad51b576de168bd
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114572
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f33e8ee4cb44e7a6326a894a9c153557238bde03
commit r12-10519-gf33e8ee4cb44e7a6326a894a9c153557238bde03
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113674
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fda7a897d037ff1c59630f0a741eb20e68f45848
commit r12-10511-gfda7a897d037ff1c59630f0a741eb20e68f45848
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7813d94393f60ac641265cb3fc3a446f9f3aea7e
commit r13-8838-g7813d94393f60ac641265cb3fc3a446f9f3aea7e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=06
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|15.0
/14/15 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression]
|internal compiler error: in |internal compiler error: in
|fld_incomplete_type_of with |fld_incomplete_type_of with
|may_alias |may_alias
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:56c73729c3eab08ca48f366bd435f98457743e45
commit r14-10286-g56c73729c3eab08ca48f366bd435f98457743e45
Author: Jakub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5a3c6d43acb8b2211d9fb59d59482d74c010f01
commit r15-1080-gd5a3c6d43acb8b2211d9fb59d59482d74c010f01
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115359
Bug ID: 115359
Summary: ICE in warn_types_mismatch: lto1: internal compiler
error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=06
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
: Fri May 24 17:00:17 2024 +0200
Fix PR c++/06: missing ; causes internal compiler error
We currently fail upon the following because an assert in dependent_type_p
fails for f's parameter
=== cut here ===
consteval int id (int i) { return i; }
constexpr int
f (auto i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66d01cc3f4a248ccc471a978f0bfe3615c3f3a30
commit r11-11467-g66d01cc3f4a248ccc471a978f0bfe3615c3f3a30
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 58337
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58337=edit
gcc15-pr114493.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That was added for C++ in PR70512.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from
{
} resolve_name_multiple_recv() {
_talloc_array();
}
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc-14 -flto -c resolve.c.10.i
during IPA pass: *free_lang_data
resolve.c.10.i:7:1: internal compiler error: in fld_incomplete_type_of, at
ipa-free-lang-data.cc:257
7 | }
| ^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #17)
> Brief note on the errors is below. Does it need to be submitted as a
> separate ticket/different bug?
Yes.
> I'd prepare a preprocessed file where the
g RTL pass: expand
stream_gribapi.c: In function 'gribapiVarCompare.isra':
stream_gribapi.c:852:1: internal compiler error: in classify_argument, at
config/i386/i386.cc:2399
852 | gribapiVarCompare(compvar2_t compVar, record_t record, int flag)
| ^
libtool: link: ( cd "
) constexpr
bool foo(char, char, unsigned int)
t.cc: At global scope:
t.cc:7:18: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
7 | static_assert(foo((char *)nullptr, nullptr, 0));
| ~~~^
0x134bdbf crash_signal
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc-match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115239
Bug ID: 115239
Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
x.0 compiler could be considered as fixed,
> thank you so much for the help here.
Good!
> Build with gnu/14.1.0 generated more ICEs, however.
> FYI, the compiler errors looked as following:
>
> -
> ...register_variable_attribute.inc:56:60:
>
> internal compiler error:
.
Build with gnu/14.1.0 generated more ICEs, however.
FYI, the compiler errors looked as following:
-
...register_variable_attribute.inc:56:60:
internal compiler error: in gfc_walk_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.cc:11870
0x75dffb gfc_walk_array_ref(gfc_ss*, gfc_expr*, gfc_ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38de942670ad39c60ba4feae893d11843e0aebe8
commit r11-11449-g38de942670ad39c60ba4feae893d11843e0aebe8
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=06
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:419b5e17eace9b6b985b9853db0dc1a5478375b6
commit r12-10467-g419b5e17eace9b6b985b9853db0dc1a5478375b6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f1457841abc2fd8657a52d1371c983ac010f1cc
commit r13-8798-g5f1457841abc2fd8657a52d1371c983ac010f1cc
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c98d06a9016a0fa3a806879bd168f13b8a606f8
commit r15-779-g3c98d06a9016a0fa3a806879bd168f13b8a606f8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #9)
> All rebuilt, gnu/14.1.0 with openmpi/4.1.6, revised configuration of the
> software stack (spack-stack). Still the same error with
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So provide fixes upstream and hope they apply them soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #12 from Natalie Perlin ---
Jakub Jelinek - thanks for your note. At this point we may not do anything
during the build, as these packages are retrieved from official spack
repository. And yes, they may often carry a lot of legacy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You want to fix the code as described in e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-14/porting_to.html , not find workarounds. The code
was apparently never valid C99+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #10 from Natalie Perlin ---
A workaround found for gnu/14.1.0 gcc that produces error instead of warnings
at times:
Using cflag="-Wno-implicit-function-declaration ..." helped to avoid errors in
the code location in my previous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #9 from Natalie Perlin ---
All rebuilt, gnu/14.1.0 with openmpi/4.1.6, revised configuration of the
software stack (spack-stack). Still the same error with
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration].
Verified a build of the same stack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115181
Bug ID: 115181
Summary: [ICE] internal compiler error in
invalid_tparm_referent_p, at cp/pt.cc:7274
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
;115159_a.H";
$ g++ -fno-module-lazy -fmodules-ts -std=c++20 115159_{a.H,b.C}
115159_b.C:1:22: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at
cp/except.cc:1202
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.3|13.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110382
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.3|13.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
--- Comment #2 from Michał Walenciak ---
Created attachment 58248
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58248=edit
preprocessed project files
main.cpp compiled with -freport-bug (ccnR6WAp.out file) plus preprocessed file
with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115159
Bug ID: 115159
Summary: internal compiler error: in nothrow_spec_p, at
cp/except.cc:1206 when using modules and
QCoreApplication
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #32 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexander Monakov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b9e68a6f3b22800a7f12b58ef6b25e3b339bb3c
commit r15-628-g4b9e68a6f3b22800a7f12b58ef6b25e3b339bb3c
Author: Alexander Monakov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112505
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a71557fbebe3fb4031d1c2adc4f89c89a8c6c62
commit r12-10454-g4a71557fbebe3fb4031d1c2adc4f89c89a8c6c62
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc6e336cb7c85094ddc77757be97c3d8588f35ca
commit r15-627-gbc6e336cb7c85094ddc77757be97c3d8588f35ca
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112793
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9bad5cf9ae446b367f666176537eb76e94cc4448
commit r12-10452-g9bad5cf9ae446b367f666176537eb76e94cc4448
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
Bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Reduced:
```
long XXH3_len_4to8_64b_len, XXH3_len_0to16_64b___trans_tmp_3,
XXH3_mix2Accs_acc,
XXH3_64bits_internal___trans_tmp_8;
typedef unsigned long XXH3_hashLong64_f();
void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 58222
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58222=edit
patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Reduction is nearly done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115128
Bug ID: 115128
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building aflplusplus
(internal compiler error: in type, at
value-range.h:983)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #33 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29)
> A minor rant, but why can't all this be set up automatically in the compile
> farm machines?
We have everything installed with the default for whatever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #8 from Natalie Perlin ---
anl...@gcc.gnu.org -
Thank you, this is a great observation! I will need to change the way the
spack-stack is built with gnu/14.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
> >
> > Can you please try the 14-release like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #32 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #31)
> > --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> [...]
> > Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here?
> >
> > srcdir/configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
[...]
> Ok, what's the minimum configuration I need to build here?
>
> srcdir/configure --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.11
>
> srcdir/configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #30 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #29)
> > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/home/aldyh/bld/clean'
> > > Comparing stages 2 and 3
> > > Bootstrap comparison failure!
> > > gcc/tree-vect-stmts.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #29 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #28)
> > --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et:
> >
> > aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #28 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> This is in cfarm216.cfarm.et:
>
> aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ hostname
> s11-sparc.cfarm
> aldyh@s11-sparc:~/bld/clean$ uname -a
> SunOS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #27 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
> > --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> > prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
> > Aarch has no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
> Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez ---
prange has been enabled again, after testing on x86-64 and ppc64le linux.
Aarch has no space to run tests on the compile farm, and sparc bootstrap was
already broken.
The problem in this PR can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718
commit r15-574-gb8e3574e68310f68116f157a35d5650600d13718
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3
commit r15-573-gf6bed6d3fcc13880ffa786b6c616e2306efe2bf3
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #20)
Thanks for looking into this.
> The IL we generate the jump function from is:
>
> _1 = cclauses_2(D) != 0B;
> c_parser_omp_all_clauses (_1);
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #6 from Natalie Perlin ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
>
> Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
> 13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #5 from Natalie Perlin ---
Created attachment 58217
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58217=edit
Most of the source files of the modules used for the fv_dynamics.F90
Most of the source files for the modules used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #4 from Natalie Perlin ---
Created attachment 58216
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58216=edit
Log file from the build of the software
Log file from the build of the software (ufs-weather-model)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #20)
> (I also cannot prevent myself from ranting a little that it would
> really help if all the ranger (helper) classes and functions were
> better documented.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #20 from Martin Jambor ---
The IL we generate the jump function from is:
_1 = cclauses_2(D) != 0B;
c_parser_omp_all_clauses (_1);
Which translates to the expected jump function:
callsite void c_parser_omp_teams(int**)/3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 115108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
Bug ID: 115107
Summary: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115108
Bug ID: 115108
Summary: f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xcf878f crash_signal toplev.cc:314
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114480
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #21)
> It is possible to reduce gcc_qsort workload by improving the presorted-ness
> of the array, but of course avoiding quadratic behavior would be much
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor ---
The following minimized testcase ICEs with r15-312-g36e877996936ab
cross-compiler to ppc64le with -O2 nicely:
void omp_clause_elt_check(int *, const char *, const char *);
enum { C_OMP_CLAUSE_SPLIT_COUNT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115062
Bug ID: 115062
Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: in
simplify_aggr_init_exp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #18 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Ah, it looks like seurer already beat me to the preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #16)
> I'll have look, hopefully on Monday.
Thanks Martin.
To reproduce the problem:
1. Revert this patch:
commit d7bb8eaade3cd3aa70715c8567b4d7b08098e699
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor ---
I'll have look, hopefully on Monday.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #11)
> I have reverted the prange enabling patch until the IPA pass is fixed.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
So this is problem in ipa_value_range_from_jfunc?
It is Maritn's code, I hope he will know why types are wrong here.
Once can get type compatibility problem on mismatched declarations and LTO, but
it seems
during IPA pass: inline
In file included from /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/solaris/gcc/c/c-parser.cc:26971:
./gt-c-c-parser.h:94:2: internal compiler error: in discriminator_fail, at
range-op.cc:205
94 | };
| ^
0x218a05b range_op_handler::discriminator_fail(vrange const&, vrange const&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 58168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58168=edit
proposed patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114985
--- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I have reverted the prange enabling patch until the IPA pass is fixed.
1 - 100 of 23773 matches
Mail list logo
