Re: aren't specialized templates templates?

Tim Janik wrote: hi all. the code snippet below is extracted from a much more complicated piece of code. basically the problem is that g++ (3.3 and 3.4) demand different typedef syntax inside template bodies, depending on whether full or partial specialization is used. is this really the correct

aren't specialized templates templates?

hi all. the code snippet below is extracted from a much more complicated piece of code. basically the problem is that g++ (3.3 and 3.4) demand different typedef syntax inside template bodies, depending on whether full or partial specialization is used. is this really the correct behaviour and

Re: aren't specialized templates templates?

Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | hi all. | | the code snippet below is extracted from a much more | complicated piece of code. basically the problem is that | g++ (3.3 and 3.4) demand different typedef syntax inside | template bodies, depending on whether full or partial | specialization is