[Bug target/17959] -mpowerpc64 can cause worse code than without it

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-28 08:27 --- powerpc-linux too. 3.4 is even worse due to needlessly setting up a stack frame. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2004-11-28 09:17 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 > 01:28 --- > Confirmed, this lo

[Bug SWING/18331] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: execute/ieee/fp-cmp-8.c gcc.dg/20040625-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 09:35 --- Recat. -- What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|SWING http://gcc.

[Bug SWING/18331] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: execute/ieee/fp-cmp-8.c gcc.dg/20040625-1.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 09:48 --- Subject: Bug 18331 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 09:48:28 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/mmix: m

[Bug target/18331] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: execute/ieee/fp-cmp-8.c gcc.dg/20040625-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:11 --- No URL; ml lag. See title "Committed: Fix PR target/18331, MMIX" at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/> whenever it shows up. This bug exists on the 3.4 branch too and may be uncovered as a regression th

[Bug target/18636] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware broken, building newlib/libm/common/s_fmax.c

-- Bug 18636 depends on bug 18331, which changed state. Bug 18331 Summary: [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: execute/ieee/fp-cmp-8.c gcc.dg/20040625-1.c http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18331 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug target/18636] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware broken, building newlib/libm/common/s_fmax.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:19 --- It certainly was the same bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/17965] ice in expand_call

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-28 10:25 --- If I recollect correctly, stack_usage_map is only relevant for libcalls that might be executed when evaluating arguments for a call. ie. There's no need to cater for arbitrary user function calls. This s

[Bug ada/18661] ACATS c974012 ICE calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:376

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 10:29 --- This now passes on x86 and x86_64, it has been fixed between "Sat Nov 27 09:45:08 UTC 2004" and "Sat Nov 27 23:11:48 UTC 2004". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18661

[Bug c++/10574] Partial specialization selection failure involving a default template parameter from inside a template

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:46 --- Work postponed to GCC 4.1. This bug is tricky to fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10574

[Bug c++/4882] fails to lookup a template specialization dependent of an outer template

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:46 --- Work postponed to GCC 4.1. This bug is tricky to fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4882

[Bug c++/13088] templatizing outer class hides specialization of inner template class

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:47 --- Work postponed to GCC 4.1. This bug is tricky to fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13088

[Bug c++/14032] non type boolean template argument partial specialization to argument in parent never matches

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 10:47 --- Work postponed to GCC 4.1. This bug is tricky to fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14032

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 11:40 --- A bit simpler testcase; no longer segfaults, but produces wrong output. The reason seems to be the same (both are due to fields of t after the second one not being initialized). .vars dump is misscompiled

[Bug java/18697] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 12:41 --- Seems it does work with a build from a few days earlier on i686-pc-linux-gnu gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20041124 (experimental) -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/18630] can't find a register in class `GENERAL_REGS' when trying to make Firefox 1.0

--- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2004-11-28 12:42 --- Subject: Re: New: can't find a register in class `GENERAL_REGS' when trying to make Firefox 1.0 Dirk dot Schwartzkopff at gmx dot de wrote: > It is impossible to compile Firefox on IBM zSeries

[Bug java/18697] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 12:59 --- I can't do anything with this bug because there's no instructions for reproducing it. Please provide a step-by-step way to demonstrate the bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18697

[Bug target/18665] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 12:59 --- This may be related to (or in fact be the same as) Bug 17603. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18665

[Bug rtl-optimization/18420] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling mesa at -O2

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:03 --- Subject: Bug 18420 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 13:02:53 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog simplify-rtx.c Log messag

[Bug rtl-optimization/15289] [3.4/4.0 Regression] reload error with non-lowpart subregs

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:08 --- Can someone reconfirm this bug? Does this still happen with the subreg validation patches? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15289

[Bug middle-end/18191] [4.0 Regression] Struct member is not getting default-initialized

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:16 --- Since this is language specific behavior, I think this is a C/C++ front end bug. The front end should produce the default initializers. What do our C/C++ FE maintainers think about this? --

[Bug middle-end/18191] [4.0 Regression] Struct member is not getting default-initialized

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18191

[Bug rtl-optimization/15289] [3.4/4.0 Regression] reload error with non-lowpart subregs

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-28 13:27 --- /src/tmp/pr15289.c: In function 'checkScc2': /src/tmp/pr15289.c:9: internal compiler error: in gen_highpart, at emit-rtl.c:1260 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15289

[Bug java/18697] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:29 --- Added the Menu part from GNU Classpath examples as simple testcase. Unfortunately after updating gcc again (version 4.0.0 20041128 (experimental)) I hit [Bug java/18699] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc with

[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/18615] biarch bootstrap fails on sparc-linux (CVS 20041121)

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:37 --- simplify_gen_subreg was seriously shaken recently. Would you mind updating and trying again? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18622] sparc64-linux bootstrap failure

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 13:37 --- simplify_gen_subreg was seriously shaken recently. Would you mind updating and trying again? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18701] New: [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware gcc.c-torture/execute failures: 20010224-1.c, 20020216-1.c, 20040218-1.c, 20040709-2.c

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 28 09:51:57 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010224-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010224-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020

[Bug target/18702] New: mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

With LAST_UPDATED: "Sun Nov 28 13:19:06 UTC 2004" I get: FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c (test for excess errors) With the message in the .log being: /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c:8: error: 'foo' undeclared (first use in this function) /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c:8: error: (Each

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 14:50 --- Also seeing this with some simple AWT programs (see bug #18697) and a recent gjdoc build (as described at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2004-11/msg00169.html). -- What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/18325] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020227-1.c (change in behavior)

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 14:56 --- The whole test now passes; time to close this bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/18702] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:07 --- Hmm, the test is correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18702

[Bug target/18701] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware gcc.c-torture/execute failures: 20010224-1.c, 20020216-1.c, 20040218-1.c, 20040709-2.c

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug target/18702] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:13 --- > Hmm, the test is correct. Here's what I get on Solaris: gax% gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -S -isysroot /home/eric/cvs/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp isysroot-1.c In file included from gcc/include/iso/stdio_iso.h:44,

[Bug ada/18661] ACATS c974012 ICE calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:376

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:17 --- So closing as fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:28 --- Reverting this patch seems to make things work again: Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/boehm-gc/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 1.212

[Bug target/18702] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/isysroot-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:32 --- So, the fault of the test seems *at least* that the test should not assume that no other options are present that cause a stdio.h to be included from elsewhere than the installed location, which is the case for t

[Bug rtl-optimization/18420] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling mesa at -O2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:40 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/18294] [4.0 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info during bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:46 --- Since PR 18420 is fixed, I checking this one too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18294

[Bug rtl-optimization/18294] [4.0 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info during bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 15:53 --- Fixed also by the patch which fixed PR18420. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/13300] [3.3, 3.4, 4.0 regression] Variable incorrectly identified as a biv

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-11-28 16:00 --- Still present in 3.3, 3.4, and 4.0 branch. Regression from 2.95. -- What|Removed |Added S

[Bug rtl-optimization/13300] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Variable incorrectly identified as a biv

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.3, 3.4, 4.0 regression] |[3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] |Variable incorrectly|Variable incorrectly

[Bug ada/18692] Ada should have a dg testsuite

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 16:14 --- I've gone through the Debian BTS bugs and tried to pull the testcases from the bugs marked fixed-upstream. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18692

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] New: [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% cat ffv1.c void encode_rgb_frame(int ring_size) { int sample[3][ring_size]; int i; for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) sample[1][-1] = sample[1][0]; } [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp% gcc -O -c -v ffv1.c Reading specs from /usr/local/stow/gcc-2004.11.11/bin/../lib/gcc/alphae

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 16:36 --- Hmm, it works with "GNU C version 4.0.0 20041126 (experimental) (alpha-linux)", Can you try a newer compiler? -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18703

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-28 16:41 --- I reverted that patch and 'make clean' in build's boehm-gc directory but now I get the following. Do I need a complete rebuild? Collecting from unknown thread. Program received signal SIGABRT, Ab

[Bug tree-optimization/18703] [4.0 regression] ICE with negative array index of VLA in loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 16:42 --- It was fixed on the 12th. : Search converges between 2004-11-11-161001-trunk (#629) and 2004-11-12-014001-trunk (#630). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/15289] [3.4/4.0 Regression] reload error with non-lowpart subregs

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-28 17:54 --- RTH, this is another subreg quirk. Care to take a look? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/18628] [4.0 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-28 18:01 --- Hmm... This is a difficult one. We manage to split a table jump sequence, and introduce a label between the indexed load of a jump table and the indirect jump. We then hoist the indexed load, and later simplify

[Bug other/17594] [3.4/4.0 Regression] GCC does not error about unknown options which starts with a valid option

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:03 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:08 --- The misscompilation appears in the .t54.dom3 dump. With -fno-tree-dominator-opts the testcase is not misscompiled. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694

[Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:12 --- (In reply to comment #10) > I should mention I also see this in a testcase in Ada acats testsuite on ppc-darwin. For the record this is ACATS c761010 and it's ppc only (works on x86 and x86_64), from Andrew's lo

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-ch)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:13 --- This is most likely related to PR 18241. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] New: Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

Compared to 3.4, the default inlining limits in 4.0 cause a 340% performance regression on the tramp3d-v3.cpp testcase here: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/gcc/tramp3d-v3.cpp.gz The regression can be attributed to the inlining limits, as patching both compilers with the leafify pa

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] [4.0 Regression] Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/18704] [4.0 Regression] Inlining limits cause 340% performance regression

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:22 --- This is most likely the same as PR 17863. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug ada/18705] New: ACATS c34002a and c460007 ICE expected integer_cst, have var_decl/nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:3783

This occurs on powerpc-darwin only (works on x86 and x86_64), Andrew Pinski suggested this is a DOM problem. +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) GCC error: | | tree check: expected integer_cst,

[Bug ada/18706] New: ACATS cc1221c and ce2208b ICE expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:637

This occurs on powerpc-darwin only (works on x86 and x86_64). Andrew Pinski commented: "most likely not renaming VOPS after getting the new virtual ops". +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) GCC err

[Bug ada/18705] ACATS c34002a and c460007 ICE expected integer_cst, have var_decl/nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:3783

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|ACATS c34002

[Bug ada/18706] ACATS cc1221c and ce2208b ICE expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:637

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:34 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does not happen on ppc-darwin, I wonder why. This problem is due to ZCX being active on x86 and x86_64 but not on ppc, if I deactivate ZCX on x86 and x86_64 (setting the system-linux-x

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a and c97117a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:38 --- c97117a fails the same way: /home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20041128T003315/gcc/xgcc -c -B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20041128T003315/gcc/ -gnatws -O2 -I/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20041128T003315/

[Bug tree-optimization/18664] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE cxaa010 expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:660

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2004-11-28 18:39 --- Note: if I deactivate ZCX on x86 and x86_64 (setting the system-linux-xxx.ads constants below to False) it passes. ZCX_By_Default: constant Boolean := True; GCC_ZCX_Support : constant

[Bug tree-optimization/18705] [4.0 Regression] ACATS c34002a and c460007 ICE expected integer_cst, have var_decl/nop_expr in tree_int_cst_lt, at tree.c:3783

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:42 --- Confirmed, what is happening is that DOM asked for the MIN/MAX_EXPR for the type but DOM thought that MIN/MAX_EXPR for a integer type is always an INTEGER_CST. -- What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/18595] [4.0 Regression] IV-OPTS is O(N^3)

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 18:42 --- IVOPTs should behave quadratically on this type of tests; I do not know where does the extra O(N) factor come from, and I would not expect the times to grow this fast. -- What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/18486] [4.0 Regression] fixincl fails with make -jN profilebootstrap

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-28 19:25 --- I believe this is the same as bug 18532. I have submitted a patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01456.html *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18532 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/18532] libgcc.mk isn't parallel build safe for multilib

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-28 19:25 --- *** Bug 18486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-28 20:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename You continue not to get it. In this context, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME has been set because assemble_external has been

[Bug c/18707] New: Performance regression at -O2 with gzip

GCC 4.0.0pre generates worse code than GCC 3.4.4pre at -O2 for gzip 1.2.4 on UltraSPARC III. I've also included Sun ONE Studio 8 as a comparison point. 32-bit GCC vs Sun ONE Studio 8 CC: cc: "-fast -xarch=v8plusb -xchip=ultra3" gcc: "-O2 -mcpu=ultrasparc3" -rwxrwxr-x 1 eric eric 724

[Bug regression/18707] [4.0 Regression] Performance regression at -O2 with gzip

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |regression Keywords||missed-optimization Summary|Performance

[Bug target/18334] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/assert4.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 20:52 --- Subject: Bug 18334 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 20:52:19 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug target/18334] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/cpp/assert4.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:00 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02472.html> -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug middle-end/14449] long long & unsigned calculation gives wrong result

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-28 21:07 --- This bug is a duplicate of PR target/9348 that I fixed on mainline back in February. Although this isn't technically a regression, I'm currently bootstrapping a regression testing a backport to the 3.4 branch fo

[Bug target/9348] [HP-UX] error in int to unsigned long multiplication

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-28 21:07 --- *** Bug 14449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/10349] testsuite failure in g++.dg/parse/stack1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:10 --- #1138 0x0005d820 in cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (parser=0x424b6c40) at /Users/pinskia/ src/local3/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:6541 #1139 0x00053100 in cp_parser_statement (parser=0x424b6c40, in_statement

[Bug middle-end/12454] [4.0 Regression] [tree-ssa] Regression in g++.dg/parse/stack1.C

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:11 --- Hmm (at least on ppc-darwin), with --disable-checking this works but without we get a stack overflow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12454

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-28 21:24 --- Recompiled libgcj and I still get the above stacktrace. Here is a testcase. import java.util.Observable; import java.util.Observer; class TT extends Observable implements Runnable, Observer { p

[Bug target/17767] [4.0 Regression] MMX intrinsics cause internal compiler error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:43 --- Hmm, a x86_64 compiler with -m32 works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17767

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 21:57 --- That TT.java example program also fails for me. The other testcases I had work again when reverting the patch in comment #3. The TT testcase fails even when I revert that patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug c++/18708] New: Obscene amount of memory required to optimize file

This file fails to compile after attempting to allocate 2G of memory with -O3. g++ test.ii -O3 I guess that the PowerPCAsmPrinter::printInstruction method is the problem. This file comes from the LLVM PPC backend. -Chris -- Summary: Obscene amount of memory required to optimize fil

[Bug c++/18708] Obscene amount of memory required to optimize file

--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2004-11-28 22:05 --- Created an attachment (id=7629) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7629&action=view) Problematic test -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18708

[Bug target/18709] New: x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

building CVS 20041128 on x86_64-linux, the bootstrap fails in /home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0ds1/build/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0ds1/build/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc-4.0-4.0ds1/build/x86_64-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/packages/gcc/4.0/gcc

[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2004-11-28 22:09 --- Created an attachment (id=7630) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7630&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18709

[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:13 --- { .__data = { .__kind = PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP } } This is a bug in glibc's headers, there is a dup of this bug somewhere. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18709

[Bug target/18337] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/array-quals-1.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:14 --- Subject: Bug 18337 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:14:34 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug target/18709] x86_64-linux bootstrap failure building libsupc++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:16 --- Yes there is PR 17364. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17364 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/17364] [4.0 Regression] c99 designators in nptl break libstdc++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:16 --- *** Bug 18709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18337] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/array-quals-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:19 --- I'll settle for an xfail, but would've preferred skipping the test. Look for message titled "Committed: gcc.dg/array-quals-1.c: Xfail for mmix-*-* (PR target/18337)" in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>

[Bug preprocessor/17610] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:28 --- Subject: Bug 17610 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:28:13 Modified files: libcpp : ChangeLog directives.c gcc

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:33 --- Fix committed to mainline; working on 3.4 backport. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fa

[Bug c++/18708] Obscene amount of memory required to optimize file

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:36 --- Fixed on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/18345] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/intmax_t-1.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:39 --- Subject: Bug 18345 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:39:05 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug target/18345] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/intmax_t-1.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:43 --- Look for "Committed, gcc.dg/intmax_t-1.c: Add mmix-*-* to dg-error. PR target/18345." at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-28 22:47 --- But the call to assemble_external has been there since the very beginning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982

[Bug tree-optimization/18463] [4.0 Regression] Moving floating point through an integer register

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:56 --- I have the (experimental) patch for addressing mode selection on trees (http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~rakdver/diff_lower_address.diff). It indeed helps; we get i = 0; :; mem[aa + 4B * i]{*D.1047} =

[Bug target/18348] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/uninit-H.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:57 --- Subject: Bug 18348 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 22:57:38 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gcc.

[Bug target/18348] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/uninit-H.c

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 22:59 --- Look for "Committed: gcc.dg/uninit-H.c (ASM): For unknown targets, define to "= 0". PR target/18348." in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/>. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/18693] ivopts regression metabug

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:04 --- Clearly too few to worry about. :-) -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/17651] [3.4 Regression] Erroneous preprocessor output with -g when generating dependencies

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 23:05 --- Aargh wrong bug. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|3.4.0 |3.4

  1   2   >