--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-14 00:42 ---
4.0 branch is closed. Gcc 4.1.2 gave
[...@gnu-3 tmp]$ cat u.cc
union Foo {
struct { float a,b,c; };
const char* x;
};
Foo foo = { .0f, .0f, .0f };
Foo foo1 = { "foo" };
[...@gnu-3 tmp]$ gcc -c u.cc
u.cc:7:
--- Comment #4 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 01:01 ---
Andrew wrote:
"GCC can assume %qE means anything from just printing E in quotes"
Can you explain this? Is it really the case that the format specifier can have
an optional argument?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #14 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 01:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=17861)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17861&action=view)
patch for just the bug at hand.
This patch just changes the next_active_insn for the exposure in this PR.
I think m
--- Comment #7 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 01:31 ---
The test case does not run in a GB of RAM on my x86-64 system. It sends the
system deep into swap until the out-of-memory manager kicks in.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39301
--- Comment #1 from dj at redhat dot com 2009-05-14 02:52 ---
Do you have a test case that shows an actual problem? Because the m32c port
has special code that tests for shift counts outside -16..16 and pre-shifts the
value to make the shift count fit (see gcc/config/m32c/m32c.c
m32c_pr
--- Comment #26 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 02:54 ---
This test now passes on powerpc*-linux-gnu.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 03:00 ---
Still present in GCC 4.5.0 (20090513).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16456
--- Comment #6 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 03:04 ---
Still present in GCC (GNU) 4.5.0 20090513 (experimental) [trunk revision
147498].
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16798
--- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 03:19 ---
Still present in GCC: (GNU) 4.5.0 20090513 (experimental) [trunk revision
147498].
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26525
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 03:24
---
Draft patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2009-05/msg00090.html
--
billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 03:35 ---
Confirmed with GCC 4.5.0 20090513 (experimental) [trunk revision 147498].
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27619
--- Comment #10 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 03:46 ---
Still present in GCC 4.5.0 20090513.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27682
--- Comment #9 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 04:03 ---
The original reporter seems to have resolved this to their satisfaction in
their CrystalSpace3d bug report. This report was due to running up against a
limitation of the -fPIC implementation.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu d
--- Comment #16 from luisgpm at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com 2009-05-14
04:12 ---
Just for the record... The 64-bit case is fixed. There are still performance
issues in the 32-bit case.
I'll attach more information soon.
Luis
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39976
--- Comment #2 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 05:16 ---
Still present in GCC 4.5.0 20090513.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31055
--- Comment #2 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 05:19 ---
Still present in GCC 4.5.0 20090513.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31557
--- Comment #2 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 05:22 ---
Still present in GCC 4.5.0 20090513. Note that -O2 or above is also required
to trigger this bug -- that was not mentioned in the original report.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 05:34 ---
Can this PR be closed now, Janis?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526
--- Comment #5 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 06:08 ---
Can this PR be closed now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38156
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 06:18 ---
Fails with 4.5.0 20090513.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #54 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-05-14
06:25 ---
I've started work on the binutils support for this. Work-in-progress patch at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-05/msg00228.html
Once that's complete, I could deal with the GCC end too.
What shou
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 06:28 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-05/msg00163.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39352
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 06:45 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from maxposedon at gmail dot com 2009-05-14 06:51 ---
in gcc-4.4.0 release this bug wasn't fixed
--
maxposedon at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
