http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2010-10-18 21:36:23 UTC
---
This is a reduction from proprietary (and complex) code, and the optimization
has regressed there as well. Any diagnosis on why it would have regressed and
not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43760
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36898
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in tree vectorization when
compiling towns_audio.cpp from scummvm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46078
Summary: [4.6 regression] new valgrind warnings when compiling
an optimization test case
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18
22:37:36 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Oct 18 22:37:32 2010
New Revision: 165666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165666
Log:
Fix PR 46041
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42561
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.0 |4.6.0
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42577
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42628
--- Comment #12 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2010-10-18 22:44:19 UTC
---
If someone resolves this bug as a duplicate of PR45700 (or vice versa), I'll
verify.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30461
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
00:08:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Andrew, can you clarify ? :-)
Since the class methods can never be called directly, the DECL_VISIBILITY of
that decl could be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45966
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
00:24:39 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Tue Oct 19 00:24:36 2010
New Revision: 165674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165674
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46027
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
00:29:18 UTC ---
Here is a full testcase:
typedef unsigned type1;
typedef unsigned char type2;
type1 t;
void f(type1 tt)
{
type2 t1 = t;
type1 t2 = t1;
t = t2 0xFF;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36084
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46079
Summary: ABI for empty stop statement broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
02:37:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I haven't yet figured out which function's stack-frame is borked / where
exactly the saved value of r7 is clobbered. Tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46079
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
02:46:16 UTC ---
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00193.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
03:20:48 UTC ---
It is caused by fact that the main() function is optimized for size except for
code in loops because we know it will be executed once.
Inliner thinks that it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
03:25:37 UTC ---
Also renaming main() to main2() so GCC no longer can track the runtime
behaviour leads to:
0: 53 push %rbx
1: bb 00 00 00 00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
04:42:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I think both indirect inlining and constant propagation should be able to get
past the cast especially when there is no type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
04:42:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I think both indirect inlining and constant propagation should be able to
get
past the cast especially when there is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-10-19 05:47:31 UTC
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-19
04:42:40 UTC ---
(In reply to
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo