http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16 06:26:33
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Mar 16 06:26:29 2011
New Revision: 171031
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171031
Log:
PR target/45844
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
--- Comment #54 from PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 06:53:47 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #53)
If I don't use LTO Optimization, Vadim Zeitlin's patch works well.
But if I use LTO Optimization, the compiling speed becomes vey slow,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48144
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45882
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
08:35:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 16 08:35:31 2011
New Revision: 171035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171035
Log:
PR debug/45882
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135
--- Comment #6 from Denis Excoffier Denis.Excoffier at airbus dot com
2011-03-16 09:13:50 UTC ---
I did try with --disable-symvers with no effect.
Indeed, have a look into libgomp/configure: lines 15784-15798 completely
cover what you may have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-16 09:38:37 UTC ---
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, joe at mcknight dot de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
--- Comment #23 from joe at mcknight dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48127
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-16 09:40:35 UTC ---
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48127
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46944
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16 09:41:24 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Mar 16 09:41:16 2011
New Revision: 171039
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171039
Log:
PR lto/46944
* configure.ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46944
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29160
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.1, 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48136
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
10:24:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 16 10:24:44 2011
New Revision: 171041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171041
Log:
PR middle-end/48136
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48136
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48140
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48141
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48143
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48146
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48145
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||townsend at astro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28367
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #42 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-16 11:58:25 UTC ---
--- Comment #41 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-15
20:38:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
#if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139
--- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2011-03-16 12:03:40 UTC ---
But the lrintf() man page says explicitly that these functions cannot set
errno. Is this the man page being too glibc-specific, or something else?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
12:14:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
But the lrintf() man page says explicitly that these functions cannot set
errno. Is this the man page being too glibc-specific,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
12:16:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
But the lrintf() man page says explicitly that these functions cannot set
errno. Is this the man
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48146
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
12:41:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 16 12:41:08 2011
New Revision: 171045
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171045
Log:
2011-03-16 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307
--- Comment #4 from rfm at gnu dot org 2011-03-16 12:43:39 UTC ---
I just searched this old bug report up, and found that I'd missed seeing (or
forgotten about) the latest response :-(
I've been running with my patch for a couple of years without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
Summary: [4.7 Regression] New debug test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 12:52:05
UTC ---
It may be caused by revision 171033:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00455.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
--- Comment #25 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-16 12:58:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Well, it confirmed that void_list_node is not used, but I can't
reproduce this fact.
Then how should we go on with this? As said, I can also only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-16 13:07:03 UTC ---
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, joe at mcknight dot de wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
--- Comment #25 from joe at mcknight dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307
--- Comment #5 from David Ayers ayers at fsfe dot org 2011-03-16 13:33:07 UTC
---
I haven't looked at my patch for quite some time but I don't remember that
there was an issue and did quite some extensive tests... but anyway it surely
has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48146
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
13:41:28 UTC ---
Indeed - the linker plugin allows us to take foo() local. The problem can
be reproduced w/o LTO with declaring foo static. Then you get
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26134
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
13:53:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 16 13:53:09 2011
New Revision: 171046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171046
Log:
2011-03-16 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
13:57:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 16 13:57:28 2011
New Revision: 171047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171047
Log:
2011-03-16 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48147
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48149
Summary: Piecewise complex pass-through not optimized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47717
--- Comment #1 from Luke A. Guest laguest at archeia dot com 2011-03-16
14:30:36 UTC ---
Further debugging gives:
$ gdb --args /home/laguest/opt/tamp/bin/gnatmake --RTS=`pwd`/boards/beagle
-XBoard=beagle -Pgnat.gpr -cargs -###
GNU gdb (GDB)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47650
--- Comment #27 from joe at mcknight dot de 2011-03-16 14:40:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
Can we use anything else to terminate the loop? Is there any other debug
output
that would be helpful for you?
Well, try to figure out who
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36150
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
14:41:50 UTC ---
More users trying to get this feature by parsing the output of GCC (which is
not meant to be machine-readable): http://www.mixtion.org/gccfilter/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 14:49:05
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 171033:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-03/msg00455.html
Hi Richard,
+ /* Even zero-sized arguments occupy one byte. */
+ if (size == 0)
+ size = 1;
That fixes it! Thanks.
Will you apply this patch yourself, or should I submit the patch and the
test case as a separate email to gcc-patches ?
Cheers
Nick
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] LTO|[4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
15:32:01 UTC ---
So, it seems this comes from a DW_TAG_GNU_call_site with
(symbol_ref:DI (read_string.constprop.0) [flags 0x43] function_decl
0x71d47000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47717
Luke A. Guest laguest at archeia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48149
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
15:55:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 16 15:55:48 2011
New Revision: 171048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171048
Log:
2011-03-16 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
Summary: Bootstrap failure in stage3 comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
--- Comment #1 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 16:14:18
UTC ---
Just to clearify that .bad_compare file was created by the build process, not
by me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
16:19:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23680
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23680
gcc47-pr48148.patch
I think this patch ought to fix it (or we could just not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
16:21:32 UTC ---
That's all files. Try --without-build-config.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.6.0
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
16:27:14 UTC ---
Do you think this is a LTO speciality because of partitioning (in which
case we should probably clear DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN on those decls we
promote to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
Summary: Bootstrap failure for x86_64-w64-mingw32 due ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-16 16:33:25 UTC ---
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 16:40:31
UTC ---
Another problem. expand_function_start has
t_save = build4 (ARRAY_REF, ptr_type_node,
cfun-nonlocal_goto_save_area,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
--- Comment #3 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 16:53:53
UTC ---
Add option --without-build-config to the build configuration. The build is
currently in progress. Build result will be reported once the build is
complete.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16 16:57:39
UTC ---
dump_tree of type is:
(gdb) call dump_tree(type)
No symbol dump_tree in current context.
(gdb) call debug_tree(type)
record_type 0x7e9b9600 istreambuf_iterator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com |jan.kratochvil at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47999
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
17:04:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 17:04:30 2011
New Revision: 171053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171053
Log:
PR c++/47999
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48139
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
17:21:57 UTC ---
According to C99, lrint does not produce domain errors. It may only produce
range errors (and isn't required to):
The lrint and llrint functions round
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16 17:25:33
UTC ---
Created attachment 23681
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23681
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-16 17:43:47 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Mar 16 17:43:41 2011
New Revision: 171056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171056
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616
nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48153
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrapping revision 171033 fails
on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #11 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-03-16 17:52:08 UTC ---
read_call_site_type in archer-jankratochvil-entryval for
DW_AT_GNU_call_site_target recognizes DW_FORM_ref* pointing to
DW_AT_declaration DIE and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
17:56:35 UTC ---
I've been actually talking about direct calls, with
DW_TAG_GNU_call_site
DW_AT_abstract_origin declaration DIE of some extern fn
and how gdb matches that to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45714
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
18:00:31 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Mar 16 18:00:23 2011
New Revision: 171057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171057
Log:
gcc:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844
--- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
18:00:32 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Mar 16 18:00:23 2011
New Revision: 171057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171057
Log:
gcc:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48148
--- Comment #13 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-03-16 18:02:51 UTC ---
In such case it expects
DW_TAG_GNU_call_site
DW_AT_low_pc
and it does not look up DW_AT_low_pc through DW_AT_abstract_origin across
linkage names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48115
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086
--- Comment #22 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
18:19:16 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Mar 16 18:19:12 2011
New Revision: 171058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171058
Log:
2011-03-16 Jack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-03-16
18:23:46 UTC ---
For the time being at least, for testing I think I'm going to adapt the code in
the GNU GSL, it's pretty simple (see randist/test.c) but at least we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086
--- Comment #23 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
18:27:41 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Mar 16 18:27:36 2011
New Revision: 171059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171059
Log:
2011-03-16 Jack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48154
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48154
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 18:43:08
UTC ---
I used -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
--- Comment #4 from Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com 2011-03-16 18:49:19
UTC ---
Now the build fails at stage 2. Below are the trailing end error messages.
[...]
/c/Gcc/Build-Test_MinWG/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/c/Gcc/Build-Test_MinWG/./prev-gcc/
-B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
18:49:54 UTC ---
Reproduced with:
struct A
{
A ();
~A ();
char buf[16];
virtual void bar (int, A, int);
};
void
foo (A *p)
{
A a;
p-bar (6, a, 7);
}
using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48152
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
19:16:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 23682
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23682
gcc47-pr48152.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48115
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
20:02:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 20:02:04 2011
New Revision: 171063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171063
Log:
PR c++/48115
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48113
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
20:03:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 20:03:01 2011
New Revision: 171064
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171064
Log:
PR c++/48113
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
20:03:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 20:03:12 2011
New Revision: 171065
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171065
Log:
PR c++/48132
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48115
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
20:03:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 20:03:46 2011
New Revision: 171066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171066
Log:
PR c++/48115
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48113
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
20:04:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 20:03:56 2011
New Revision: 171067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171067
Log:
PR c++/48113
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48132
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-16
20:04:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 16 20:04:06 2011
New Revision: 171068
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=171068
Log:
PR c++/48132
*
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
