http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49048
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49057
Summary: benchmark of gcc. a piece of loop code compiled by
gcc-4.5.1 is slower compiled by gcc-4.4.2 when run on
cortex-a9.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49026
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Summary: [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using
std::bind with -pedantic option.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49048
--- Comment #6 from Cecilio s.cecilio at gmail dot com 2011-05-19 07:12:25
UTC ---
Thanks for the link. Funny website but a great article at wikipedia. Thanks
indeed. Now I understand the issue, so there is no bug anywere! I always
understood
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
07:44:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 19 07:44:31 2011
New Revision: 173888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173888
Log:
PR c++/48869
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.1, 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49043
--- Comment #2 from Joel Yliluoma bisqwit at iki dot fi 2011-05-19 08:10:06
UTC ---
Even if the lambda function is not called, it happens. Merely defining the
function causes it.
Interestingly though, it does not happen if a method body is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-05-19 08:05:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
As a general rule, d specifies the number of significant digits in the result,
i.e. the number of digits counting from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48869
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
08:00:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 19 08:00:50 2011
New Revision: 173889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173889
Log:
PR c++/48869
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47440
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49048
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-19
08:42:45 UTC ---
Glad that the issue is clear now. By the way, Cecilio, apparently in your
Comment #4 you didn't get my point about the C++ library vs printf: the ISO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 08:49:32 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu May 19 08:49:28 2011
New Revision: 173893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173893
Log:
2011-05-19 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49043
Joel Yliluoma bisqwit at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++0x] Returns from lambda |[OpenMP C++0x]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44217
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49043
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49054
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
08:56:11 UTC ---
I think this is just an artifact of how we handle __builtin_unreachable ().
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 09:03:15 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu May 19 09:03:12 2011
New Revision: 173894
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173894
Log:
2011-05-19 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-05-19 08:56:37
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49052
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49046
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49052
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 09:01:30
UTC ---
Not a GCC bug.
As an aside, CIFS mounts work quite well IF the server supports the CIFS Unix
extensions; Samba supports those, but IIRC the Windows CIFS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49046
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 09:33:52 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu May 19 09:33:49 2011
New Revision: 173896
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173896
Log:
2011-05-19 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49056
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48207
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flast at flast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
10:40:13 UTC ---
Can you please ping this patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Wouter van Gulik wvangulik at xs4all dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48985
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
10:45:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 19 10:45:26 2011
New Revision: 173901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173901
Log:
2011-05-19 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49059
Summary: Linking with -flto fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49059
--- Comment #1 from Petr petr.malik at hotmail dot com 2011-05-19 10:51:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 24288
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24288
Preprocessed source.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petr.malik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49059
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-19 11:07:14 UTC ---
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
10:38:20 UTC ---
Can this be closed now?
No, skipping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060
Summary: use of deleted memory in __gnu_cxx::hashtable::erase
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060
--- Comment #1 from David Tardon dtardon at redhat dot com 2011-05-19
11:26:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 24290
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24290
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
11:28:25 UTC ---
If you can't attach to a running process, that sounds like either a gdb bug, or
kernel bug, certainly not a gcc fault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-19
12:04:27 UTC ---
Personally I consider this legacy code essentially frozen, and don't mean to
spend time on it barring serious regressions. If Ian can review the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49061
Summary: wrong code with ARM NEON intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49062
Summary: [4.7 regression] Many C++ tests ICE on Tru64 UNIX:
non-DECL_ONE_ONLY node in a same_comdat_group list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49062
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48903
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48949
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-19 12:16:25 UTC ---
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
11:28:25 UTC ---
If you can't attach to a running
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48822
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49061
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48921
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
12:58:34 UTC ---
It was the last case I was having trouble with. I also was getting different
results from different compilers, so I needed to confirm independently. I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-05-19 13:05:42 UTC ---
On Thu, 19 May 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49038
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49063
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
13:07:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 19 13:07:50 2011
New Revision: 173906
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173906
Log:
2011-05-19 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49043
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
13:12:02 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 19 13:11:56 2011
New Revision: 173907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173907
Log:
PR c++/49043
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49063
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-11.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49063
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49043
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49043
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
13:14:00 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 19 13:13:57 2011
New Revision: 173908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173908
Log:
PR c++/49043
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49064
Summary: [x86/x64]: broken alias analysis leads vectorizer to
emit poor code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49064
--- Comment #1 from Piotr Wyderski piotr.wyderski at gmail dot com 2011-05-19
14:27:28 UTC ---
This is caused by the following definition in emmintrin.h:
/* The Intel API is flexible enough that we must allow aliasing with other
vector types,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40483
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 14:29:11 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Thu May 19 14:29:05 2011
New Revision: 173913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173913
Log:
PR target/40483
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49065
Summary: Write of non-aligned volatile float generates extra
read instructions on PowerPC
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40483
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49059
Petr petr.malik at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066
Summary: [C++0x] Non-defining declaration of deleted function
suppresses usage validation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
--- Comment #21 from Edmar Wienskoski edmar at freescale dot com 2011-05-19
15:52:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Edmar, have you posted your alternative patch to gcc-patches?
That's where patch review is done, not in bugzilla.
I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
16:09:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 24291
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24291
Fix
Here's a fix, which breaks bind, so I'm not going to check it in yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
2011-05-19 16:26:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I disagree. The transformation of array to pointer is done immediately at
declaration time (8.3.5/6), so there is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051
--- Comment #3 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
2011-05-19 16:56:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
I disagree. The transformation of array to pointer is done immediately at
declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49048
--- Comment #8 from Cecilio s.cecilio at gmail dot com 2011-05-19 17:01:15
UTC ---
Thanks again, Paolo and Jackub, for your help and explanations. Believe it or
not, I a have a PhD and had to learn a lot of complex mathematics, but I never
heard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49032
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
17:07:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24293
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24293
gcc47-pr49032.patch
Untested fix. Works on this testcase, as well as when s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49067
Summary: Internal Compiler Error with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49051
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49068
Summary: Failure to auto-cast in expression, results in broken
code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49068
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
18:17:17 UTC ---
It does say which argument too: argument 6.
-shared
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110519 (experimental) [trunk revision 173917] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. /home/ryan/ice.i -Os
/home/ryan/ice.i: In function 'foo':
/home/ryan/ice.i:23:11: internal compiler error: in gen_cstoredi4, at
config/arm/arm.md:7554
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49068
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
18:16:53 UTC ---
jape+3 is the issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49070
Summary: ObjC++ compiler fails to compile ObjC method
invocations without keyword arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
reconfirmed||2011.05.19 18:36:55
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19 18:36:55
UTC ---
Confirmed. The testcase fails to compile with
gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110519 (experimental).
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49071
Summary: Wrong code with -fschedule-insns (x86-64)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-05-19 19:09:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Changing the type to ssecomi (like below, as in atom.md) fixes this.
Uros, does this look right to you? The other ssecomi*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-05-19 19:06:15 UTC ---
I found another example that convinces me that the current behaviour is a real
bug and that this issue is not just an enhancement request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49071
--- Comment #1 from John Regehr regehr at cs dot utah.edu 2011-05-19 19:27:34
UTC ---
May be related to 48124
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49061
--- Comment #2 from Julien Pommier hules at free dot fr 2011-05-19 19:30:49
UTC ---
Thanks Ira, I guess you are right. Testing with the latest gcc 4.6.1 snapshot,
the bug seems to be gone !
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072
Summary: Error building the compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #49 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-19
20:53:36 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu May 19 20:53:33 2011
New Revision: 173920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173920
Log:
2011-06-19 Tobias Burnus
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
